Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: a critical review

Barnett-Page, E and Thomas, J (2009) Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: a critical review. NCRM Working Paper. NCRM. (Unpublished)

PDF (NCRM working paper)


In recent years, a growing number of methods for synthesising qualitative research have emerged. There is a need for researchers and commissioners to be able to distinguish between these methods and to select which method is the most appropriate to their situation. We searched the literature, using a high sensitivity Google Scholar search, “pearl-growing‟ techniques and by hand-searching key journals, to identify distinct approaches to qualitative meta-synthesis. Two hundred and three papers were found and nine distinct approaches to qualitative synthesis were identified: meta-narrative synthesis, critical interpretive synthesis, meta-study, meta-ethnography, grounded formal theory, thematic synthesis, textual narrative synthesis, framework synthesis and ecological triangulation. A number of methodological and conceptual links between these methods were identified and explored, while contrasting epistemological positions explained differences in approaches to issues such as quality assessment and extent of iteration. Methods broadly fall into “realist‟ or “idealist‟ epistemologies. Commissioners of qualitative syntheses might wish to consider the kind of product they want and select their method – or type of method – accordingly.

Item Type:Working Paper (NCRM Working Paper)
Uncontrolled Keywords:NCRM Publications
Subjects:4. Qualitative Data Handling and Data Analysis > 4.23 Qualitative Approaches (other)
9. Research Skills, Communication and Dissemination > 9.1 Researching Literature
9. Research Skills, Communication and Dissemination > 9.7 Research Skills, Communication and Dissemination (other)
ID Code:690
Deposited By: Mrs Kaisa Puustinen
Deposited On:20 Mar 2009 12:05
Last Modified:25 Nov 2010 15:29

Repository Staff Only: item control page